I talked to a friend of mine tonight about my school and got on the topic of what a massive undertaking our product is and can become. I have found myself quite overwhelmed at times, especially reading Kurzweil, wondering how I will get my head around the entirety of information science. So many aspects, thoughts, ideologies, issues, concerns, answers! And how, when/if I do get my head around it, will I be able to help others with it all?
I went back to the article from the Utne Reader and found another interesting aspect of this whirlwind of information. Karen Olsen, the author of the first article Are We Overwhelmed by Too Many Choices? reflects on the fact that abundance of choice is a defining feature of our country and generation, which is linked tightly to our individual self-image as well. She writes:
Our choices seem especially fraught with anxiety now as [our selections] are more than ever declarations of who we are…with each decision you are constructing an identity for all the world to see and judge you by.
**and this was pre-social networking!**
Then she goes on to make the point that the anxiety come from the lack of time to make that decision. This is similar to what we talked about in class about the need for reflection time. The dread rate of change has got us so wrapped up in that it nearly doesn’t allow for a moments wait. Think about searching the internet. We are constantly searching for a faster response. It is clear that when we don’t have an outlet or learn to incorporate reflection into a major part of our lives, we will translate that impatience with a machine response times on to people, our interactions with patrons, our personal relationships, to new ideas, and to new technologies.
It is also similar to the modern (or maybe its mostly Western) movement in social (per this article) and religious thought that everything begins to be OK, whatever feels right to you is best. Such freedom of choice, it might be said, begins to corrupt the moral fiber when considering very sensitive social issues (e.g. abortion, pornography). Maybe that’s a sweeping statement and might reflect some bias. But, I wonder if this isn’t a message in what the author is also saying, that we can’t be afraid of making these statements that reflect one of our many sides or ways of seeing things. I guess I’m not afraid of these statements because I expect to reflect of them further, refine them, and edit them if needed.