Posts Tagged ‘ ALA ’

Core Competencies for Electronic Resources Librarians #alamw14

How I missed adding Dr. Sarah Sutton’s presentation of Electronic Resources Core Competencies to my scheduler, I’ll never know.  But, thanks to Twitter, I got there in time to catch the key points, just after Sutton’s overview of the competencies themselves.

Sutton gave high praise to many of the unique ways (mostly academic) libraries are already putting the competencies into practice. Most are using them to analyze, restructure, and define workflows and staffing, either at the department or unit level, and even across the entire library. The latter speaks to a significant takeaway of the competencies, that in most cases “one person can’t possibly do all of this”.  The competencies document emphasizes how they are not a set of competencies for an e-resources librarian, but a focus on the collaborative nature of managing these resources throughout the organization.  Other applications Sutton shared include informing MLS course programming and continuing education opportunities for both professionals and paraprofessionals, and creating job descriptions and hiring advertisements.  The audience provided additional applications, such as assessing and targeting specific areas of strengths and weaknesses.

Sutton plans to continue her research by investigating how the competencies shape student learning outcomes in MLS programs.  For myself, I see connections to my research interest in organizational communication, as well as pursuing the question of how you develop training in these competencies, especially in such amorphous concepts as “tolerance for ambiguity and complexity”.  How do you practice that, and how do you measure it?!

There was an important final question from the floor that spoke to how these competencies relate to Emery & Stone’s Techniques for E-resources Management (TERMS).  Sutton aptly addressed the similarities between the two, while noting the two have differing approaches — TERMS being more practical in nature and the Core Competencies being more conceptual, addressing the knowledge skills, and abilities of the people doing the work of e-resources management.  I shared my agreement with others in the audience that the two are complementary,  pointing out that I posed a very similar question for the TERMS project  —  imagining how techniques mapped to the e-resources life cycle could extend to mapping improved workflows and organizational communication.

The nature of e-resources evokes themes of constant change and adaptability.  As such, the process for updating these competencies, according to Sutton, will be ongoing, and the opportunities for training and other applications of the competencies will continue to evolve.  It will be interesting to see how the programming takes shape for the upcoming ER&L, and especially NASIG’s Annual Conference in Fort Worth, as its call for proposals were modeled on these Core Competencies.

Advertisements

motown philly yall #alamw14

Just realized while traveling that this might be my very first ALA Midwinter.  I attended a midwinter pre-conference ages ago, but I don’t think I have ever attended a full midwinter conference.  I always conceived of it so much smaller than annual — it’s just a bunch of meetings — but I find my schedule already jam-packed with interesting sessions and worrying how to fit in everyone else I want to see.  Part of this is that I arranged to bring husband along, making this a trip for work and pleasure, because otherwise who in their summer-loving mind would go Philadelphia in the middle of winter?!Image

We spent a long 6 hours of travel yesterday, flying in and out of Chicago, where husband threatened to deplane and have me pick him up on the way back.  But we settled for a birds-eye view of his favorite city as we continued the last leg.  It was a long final descent into Philly, much cloudier, and with much more snow.  Although the anticipation nearly drove me bonkers, it was pretty cool to see ever closer snapshots of the snow-covered quarries, rivers, and neighborhoods between each cloudy whiteout.

Image

Unfortunately, except for the blessed view of the basilica right out our window, our room is a bit “meh”, mostly because there was either a mix up, or else simply no single king rooms available, despite my two and a half month advance registration.  So husband I are making due with doubles.  We may try to spice it up by taking advantage of separate beds tonight.  We’ll probably sleep soundly, regardless, after taking the mid-day today to walk around Philly within a brisk 3 hours.

Image   christs church

IMG_4129[1]  IMG_4144[1]   IMG_4146[1]

We took an early lunch at Reading Terminal Market where we chose Old City Coffee and a large slice of brick oven pizza. Then we walked ourselves down to Old City District where we saw a few Benjamin Franklins and his bridge, Christ Church and its cemetery, and the very quaint (even in January) Elfreth’s Alleyway.  The sunshine and all this walking made the bitter cold bearable until husband lost his hat somewhere in the ALA registration area.  So we made a final stop back at the Reading Terminal market for another coffee and some Pennsylvania Dutch treats before high tailing it back to the hotel.  I chose Pineapple Upside-down Pie (brilliant!) and you can see for yourself in the obligatory foodie shot how delicious it was!   Such pleasure has prepared me well for the work that will come early tomorrow.

IMG_4151[1]

truthberry picking

New thing.  I read the American Libraries Direct newsletter each week and often fill my browser with tabs of the items I find most interesting, sharing some in facebook, others via email to library colleagues.  It occurred to me today that I could use this as a blogging opportunity and aggregate my favorites here.  My hope is that perhaps  my research foci will emerge out of this effort and that you, dear readers (if you exist), may find common narrowed interest.

So, truthberry is actually the more common Rasta reinvention of the word library.   That I more often call it a truthbrary (and ourselves as truthbrarians) is just to make the connection a little clearer.  But how nicely it serves my purpose here for the berries of truth I picked out of the interwebs this week.

It occurs to me Zotero will also be my dear friend in this effort.  So, stay tuned.

Why non-academics should be following the Georgia State U case (Copyright Librarian blog)  Did I mention this might be my favorite library topic?

…a ruling against fair use at Georgia State would do a lot to establish that any time a copyright holder is willing to sell a license, not taking them up on it is inherently infringement.

As an ACRL Legislative advocate, I’m always looking for succinct pointers to help communicate the value of academic libraries.  When talking about the library remember N3P3: an advocacy talking points framework for academic libraries (Ubiquitous Librarian blog) is a useful start.

A few nods to my Learner strength and some good tips for organizational effectiveness from your desk to your desktop.

And, finally, because Borders declared bankruptcy and, thus, closed in my town while the little (and very awesome) local bookstore around its corner remains, a tribute:  Independent Bookstores in New Orleans say they’re thriving (Nola.com, via AL Direct June 8, 2011).  Also, yet another reason I am bummed to not be going to ALA New Orleans.

ala dc – the rest of the story

It was simply foolish of me to think I could do a play-by-play of this enormous conference. I quickly realized what a tiring feat attending an entire ALA conference can be.  I arrived Thursday to attend a Friday all-day preconference and stayed on through the closing sessions Tuesday, including the Library Advocacy Day rally on Capitol Hill.  It wasn’t that I woke each morning at 6am to catch the metro, but more the greater amount of walking, intense thinking, and extended mingling with large groups of people than this introvert usually would experience in a given day. So, while what follows is a lot more to go through in one sitting, I will try to cover just the highlights, giving you a good idea of what a technical services academic librarian might be thinking about these days.

The preconference:  I think there probably ought to be a session at the next conference that helps people come up with original titles for these sessions. They all seem to follow the tired formula phrases like “Taming the fill in the blank library problem [and] fill in the blank wild animal” or use that really terrible Herding Cats metaphor often given to describe stubborn personnel or other things beyond our control.  Perhaps I could start with a study of the frequency of these titles — I personally have attended two “Taming…” preconferences that were not explicitly part of a series. Anyway, this one was on e-resource license negotiations. There was good discussion, good presenters and the opportunity to go through a practical license example as a group. All in all, very useful.

The multiple overlapping main conference sessions that were heavily attended included various takes on the topics of weeding (or if you prefer, deaccessioning), e-books, collaboration, and data driven decision-making.

Ebooks and Usage

About e-books and about usage data, the big takeaways are that e-books lag in functionality and usage data than their e-journal cousins.  Most folks seemed to think the solution would be for them to move to resemble the e-journal model in accessibility and of course in standardization (COUNTER compliance) of usage data.  I like the perspective response to whether e-books have been worth it, by countering with the question of whether print books were worth it (see 80/20 phenomenon in collection development, (Leimkuhler, 1969)). But the argument can’t be resolved on use alone.  As the deaccessioning debate makes clear, there are bigger more fundamental issues to address with respect to the value of electronic resources or even entire concept of the digital library.

Deaccessioning and the Digital Library

One of the more memorable and heavily attended main sessions, Multiple Formats and Multiple Copies in a Digital Age: Acceptance, Tolerance, Elimination (ALCTS – CMDS, RUSA – CODES), approached the topic of deaccessioning and seemed a perfect follow-up to the conversation my library began just before I left. This group of presenters was more than approaching the topic, however.  They experienced, for better or worse, the deaccessioning process, including deduping print with online formats. They reminded and reassured the audience of the library’s long reformatting history (e.g. newspapers, microfilm, audio/video) and offered simultaneously visionary and tangible paths for the future of libraries. Some of these ideas included that in 10-20 years most print collections will be special collections; that in fact, “collection” will no longer be a useful term – preferring rather the term network or cloud library; and the mindset that if it is not indexed on the web, its existence will be hard to prove.  We are certainly experiencing bits of all of this already.

Some useful advice included forging agreements with partner libraries, aggressively pushing electronic browsing for all collections, and — as I, an alum of a University with a strong Engineering program, have been saying all along – push Engineering schools to develop e-readers [and more!] that are better suited for the needs of networked libraries.

Communication/Collaboration

Consortial licensing was touched on in the preconference and ‘memorandums of understanding’ were proposed in the deaccessioning discussion. Another opportunity I had to delve into the realm of collaboration and communication came in a round table discussion with Technical Services Managers in Academic Libraries Interest Group Program (ALCTS).  We discussed many of the ways each of our organizations is trying to manage communication. Many of us are creating wikis with similar underuse by the rest of our staff.  Many of us are having regular face to face meetings with similar under-participation by the rest of our staff.  But, two big takeaways I did appreciate:

1)      successful implementation of any development effort involves identifying ‘expert users’, specifically individuals who are both good with people and good with technology, and…

2)      the utter importance of organization (hey this is what we do best right?)

One library credited the success of its wiki to the well-organized effort of the Department Head with the responsibility of keeping it well-structured and  up to date.  This echoes a consistent theme I heard: “pick one thing and do it well”.  That goes for development and communication, eh?

I was also anticipating a session by LLAMA/LOMS addressing my research interest in interorganizational communication. I had a good experience last annual in Chicago at a session from this same group.  This year, the session was Communication at the Crossroads: The Theory and Practice of Connecting Effectively Within and Without the Organization.  Sadly, the presenters kind of failed – or their presentations failed — to communicate on many levels.  Presenting lesson #1:  If you’re going renegade and not using a PowerPoint:

1)      you’d better be a dynamite verbal communicator, esp. in a large setting (in other words: don’t read from your material), and…

2)       at the very least, don’t leave the former presenter’s PowerPoint slide up while you’re talking.

The first presenter (with PowerPoint) basically gave the 10 minutes version of Organizational Communication Theory 101.  Interesting, but underdeveloped and disconnected from the practical concerns of those in the room.   It also focused more on the sender-receiver side of communication theory overall. Only with the brief mention of making decisions in context (Schein) and reducing anxiety (Van Maanen) did it touch on my MLS preferred construct of addressing communication gaps (see Dervin).

The second presenter talked about how much she loves being a manager and her practical advice could be summarized with “you have to talk to your staff”.  True – and sad there actually is enough a need to have to point that out.  But she made some good points, like reminding us that work doesn’t get done through the org chart. That what is really needed to fill in the gaps (there you go) are behavioral charts, because it’s not so much what you know these days as who you know – and she meant that in the least nepotistic way possible. I think.

Another large point brought up, but inadequately addressed was the issue of multimodal communication.  It reminded me of the work of Nancy Baym – a communications professor that our library’s Development Committee brought into a panel discussion. Baym points to research testing the prevailing assumption that electronic communication negates face to face communication or worse erodes our relational closeness. The research, she argues, actually suggests that we use each in context of the communication need and that multi-modal communication may even be an indicator of increased relational closeness or satisfaction.

So, I suppose sometimes the value of session comes in what is left out because it presents opportunities to expand one’s own research.   In addition to what I’ve mention expanding upon above, other random thoughts that sparked some potential for further reflection include the pick something, do it well philosophy; don’t fear transparency; and remembering that good organization is the key to so many successes.

Baym, N. K. (2009). A Call for Grounding in the Face of Blurred Boundaries Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (3), 720-723

Dervin, B. (May 2005). Sense-making studies. The Sensemaking Methodology Site. http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/

Leimkuhler, F.F. (1969). Some behavioral patterns of library users: the 80/20 rule.  Wilson Library Bulletin, 43. 458-61.

Shein, E. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Van Maanen, J. (1979). People-processing: Strategies of organizational socialization. Organizational Dynamics, 7 (1), 18-36.

ala dc – day two

nonsense

Sight-seeing lesson #1: there is a reason they call them sensible shoes. You really just shouldn’t ever think that you can make do in sandal pumps.  I not only chose these non-sensible shoes for my long walk to and through the Mall (twice), but my alternative to the burning sensation this footwear choice provided was pretty non-sensical (next photo).

not-any-better-sense

Sight-seeing lesson #2: Barefoot is not the best alternative to sensible shoes, certainly not for trekking up and down the streets of, really, any big city at all.

ouch!

This will only get you a big blister on the sole of your foot and (count ’em) three blisters on your toes, not to mention plenty of funny looks from folks. Even my toes are frowning!

Washington Monument

Sight-seeing lesson #3: don’t put yourself in a position to rush through memorials and monuments. I did enjoy the novelty (and brief relief) of walking barefoot the last stretch toward Lincoln Memorial, and I convinced myself that it was quite reverent of me to have removed my shoes to enter in with quiet respect as instructed by the signs.

Lincoln Memorial

Up to the point of taking these shots, I was feeling really good about the pace of my visit.  But my visit was also somewhat complicated by the fact that I was trying to find friends, who were about 20 minutes ahead of me at every turn.  (Did I mention I am a terrible multitasker?).  So, this worry along with the growing evening hour kept my attention a little removed from the full experience. My little camera phone did pretty well, though not good enough to capture the beautiful, near full (and pink) moon we had.

Even with blistered feet, and a headache and backache all through my preconference, it was a beautiful day.  I’m about a day behind in my reporting, having decided to said nothing of my adventures on the official start of the conference — the day I had today was not worth mentioning except for some good conference sessions. But, I think I’ll reserve posts of the preconference and other sessions separately from the sights of this beautiful city.

ala dc – day one

Traveling Lesson #1:  Don’t read books that make you cry. You’re sitting next to strangers in a small metal box flying high in the air.  It’s just  not a good idea.  I made it only to page 23 of  Ellen Fitzpatrick’s  Letters to Jackie: Condolences from a Grieving Nation before my eyes blurred over with too many tears to make out any more text. And I was holding back under the circumstances!  Come to think of it, where does one find an appropriate spot to sob through a book?

I start my conferencing tomorrow with a pre-conference.  I hope that having left my badge somewhere back home will be of minor consequence and that I will successfully haggle a new one from the registration desk.  I did remember to bring more clothes than I’ll need, more books than I’ll read, and a swimsuit that I will probably not have occasion for. It’s ok to laugh at me.

I anticipate having a sight-seeing lesson to share tomorrow as I attempt to visit 2 Smithsonian Museums and the Lincoln Memorial via a stroll through the National Mall after my pre-conference lets out.

Wish me luck and energy!

%d bloggers like this: