Archive for the ‘ Uncategorized ’ Category

#ohai #2016election – so much work to do

Oof, change is hard. Right? We know this. I know this.

One of the things I am trying to change is becoming more confident in my own personal and professional life — confidence in thought, leading to confidence in writing and speaking; confidence in listening, leading to confidence in understanding, disagreement, acceptance; confidence in love, leading to confidence in transformation…change.

I have so much work to do.  I know this. We know this.

Part of that work has been this humble blog, started as a passionate, yet existentially fearful graduate student, and continued in fits and starts since then as motherhood, loss, therapy, and professional development has inspired me.

This summer I began contributing regularly to ACRLog — a professional blogging community of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) — in hopes it would challenge me to a more regular habit of writing and truth seeking.  And I think it  has helped me approach some issues there and elsewhere about which I have found myself previously hesitant.  In my professional sphere, for example, with diversity, equity, and social justice; in my personal sphere, indigenous rights, generally and the #NoDAPL movement, specifically; and in the civic sphere, my duty to be more informed in this election. It is my response to the results of the latter that has me writing here again today,  trying to break the silence that I find continues to paralyze me. If anything, though, I am beginning to get good and angry about it.

Weeks before the election when my girls asked who I thought would win, I was silent.  All I could think and say was that whatever happens, I anticipate the uncertainty, violent discord, and injustice will remain.  Digging into the election via my social networks (as just one path),  I made concerted efforts to stretch my thinking all around, hearing and seeing people who I respect, and those I’ve struggled to respect, share, vent, and discuss, both civilly and angrily. I used my eyes and ears very openly, but I used my voice very selectively, limited my election posts to neutral facts, voting information, silly animals, and an autumn image of my polling station instead of an “I voted” selfie. As husband was following the election results last night and sharing worrying tidbits, I tried to remain unaffected, even suggesting that he stop watching. “Flee with me to the safe haven of denial!”,  I thought. I find denial, though,  usually leads to indigestion, or when fear and anger ultimately push through, then usually tears.  Both are at least helpful in reminding me that I’ve gotten off track. Learning mindfulness and breathing techniques in response to these triggers helps, and is what got me to sleep last night.

But I’m gonna need more than tears, more than mindfulness, more than the distraction of work in order to face today, tomorrow, the next four years, and the larger goals I have for my life and my relationship with others. This became pointedly clear as I awoke to my youngest, who at 5:45AM was getting dressed, singing to herself “Party in the U.S.A”, and then just shrugged (read: attempted to suppress all actual feelings) at hearing the election outcome.   It will take more than liking friends’ responses on social media to be able to find and speak with my own voice bravely in like manner.  It will take more to respectfully honor and support my work colleagues and staff — those who took the day today, and those relieved at the election’s outcome. It will certainly take more than voting.

My own reactions to the election are more than just about the candidates who won or lost, although, of course there is still that.  I didn’t want Trump to win, but I was not surprised. I sympathize with the anger and despair shared in response.  But I know my own anger and sadness really points to a frustration at my paralysis, and the fear that comes with knowing that only I am responsible.  Only I can change.  I truly believe the thoughts, words, and actions of individuals affect a spiritual fabric that underlies real change, and that the converse is true as well. So, believing that, I accept that I am responsible, despite or because my silent intentions, for the lack of change I wish to see in our world.

I will continue to learn from and be grateful for friends, colleagues, feminists, artists, writers, who express themselves so boldly.  I will continue to hold my leaders accountable and I will continue to vote.  I will thank those who forgive me when I remain silent in fear, and those who support me when I show up, stuttering, rambling, and all.

I can and will continue to do hard things.

What’s this I hear about a new Knowledge Base? #PQsummit

Presenter: Yvette Diven, Product Manager Lead, Data Services (ProQuest)

Diven provided a status update and more information on the work to improve the ProQuest knowledge base (KB).  The original KB has been around for more than 15 years —  originally called “Serials Solutions Knowledge Works” — and focused on e-resource metadata (titles, database, provider, dates, etc).  The KB provider is responsible for getting content from providers and cleaning and normalizing the data.  Because the KB is centralized and singular, it services across all products.  That is the benefit.   Some reasons Diven outlined for new approach to building an improved KB include:

  • Scope: now global and more diverse (audio, streaming video, etc)
  • Scale:  cloud-based capabilities
  • Systems: need for speed and efficiency  (time to work with providers and to get systems updated)
  • Services: APIs  and interoperability. BIG PART OF THE NEW KB

Some current efforts in this include addition of OA titles and packages, related titles and formats, A&I coverage information [does this include title level?], more descriptive content, the ability to add and describe more and new content types, inclusion of more information about package changes over time.

Libraries benefit from the ability to have the entire collection centrally supported, follow and manage new and emerging business models (e.g DDA), and can  see and share integrated data from many sources.

It is an evolution, transformation —  not a migration.

Integration of data is enhanced by new “relational” data model that is built on FRBR and RDA, and available to share via API and interoperability.

What it means for library workflows can be more effective assessment through a united view of related resources, more efficient ability to track changes of title and packages over time, and expanded coverage for more effective and automated overlap analysis.

What it means for research is improving discovery though more relational data points that include recommendation, impact, and  additional vocabularies.

Questions from the audience:

Q: Integration of various metadata, RM index separate from Summon, talk more about integration of these two?

A:  The knowledge base is the supporting metadata for the full content that is in Summon.   Summon will be able to gain additional, richer data about the resources it indexes. Availability data does not live in KB, but holdings data is.  The API will work to query availability in ILS.

Q: Talk about preservation data and the ability to add in.

A:  Have the ability to do that, just a matter of getting it in.

Q: Problem with ProQuest support passing the buck to libraries to report to publishers their article link errors or missing titles in packages.

A: Because OpenURL is often the cause, we are working with vendors to implement the new IEDL technology, which is being implemented by other discovery systems.  GALE (number one offender), reports they have implemented.

Q: Is there a continued commitment to fix errors, especially as FRBR may introduce more opportunity for calling things different things and create potential for errors.

A: Provider education is an entire group of staff at ProQuest committed to addressing this.

Q: New content types are great, can you speak more to enhancing the metadata for these, especially classification of streaming content?

A: The structure is now there in the knowledge base, now about getting that from providers.

Q: something more important than streaming metadata?

A: Ebook data quality Goal to have a single knowledge base  without exceptions for MARC (other) records.   (e.g. one of the status fields created in Intota is Subscribed – Local MARC records; would like to stop having to use that).

Q: Timeline for product onboarding?

A: Using new KB currently in Intota. Q1 of next year  planned for Summon, Ejournal platform, and Link.

  • [Followup Q/A asked by this reporter]: The new KB does not and is probably not planned for future to that include onboarding for Client Center RM because of the architecture is not able to support it (swimming pool to tin can problem).